Keywords: Plagiarism, Information Retrieval, Similarity Detection, Research Activity, Retraction of Publication as Topic, Research and Development, Publication Ethicsįailure to obtain permission to reproduce previously published material and to acknowledge primary sources are the main components of the misappropriation ( 2). It is the right time to enforce adherence to global editorial guidance and implement a comprehensive anti-plagiarism strategy by helping all stakeholders of scholarly communication. The evolving preventive strategies are increasingly relying on intelligent (semantic) digital technologies, comprehensively evaluating texts, keywords, graphics, and reference lists. Manipulative editing also finds its way to predatory journals, ignoring the adherence to publication ethics and accommodating nonsense plagiarized items. Recent mass retractions of plagiarized articles by reputable open-access journals point to critical deficiencies of current anti-plagiarism software that do not recognize manipulative paraphrasing and editing. But such a tool alone proves inefficient for preventing complex forms of plagiarism. Over the past decade, the advent of anti-plagiarism software checks has helped uncover elementary forms of textual recycling across journals. Poor research management, absence of courses on publication ethics, and limited access to quality sources confound plagiarism as a cross-cultural and multidisciplinary phenomenon. In some non-Anglophone countries ‘copy-and-paste’ writing still plagues pre- and postgraduate education.

Anti plagiarism serial number